Alarm Sounded – 5G Technology Under Scrutiny

cell phone

Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, raises alarming concerns about the health risks posed by 5G technology.

At a Glance

  • Frank Clegg, Former President of Microsoft Canada, calls for stricter regulations on 5G technology.
  • Peer-reviewed research shows 5G’s radiofrequency radiation can cause severe health risks.
  • The FCC’s outdated guidelines fail to protect the public from long-term wireless exposure.
  • Clegg advocates for increased public education and safer technological solutions.

Unmasking the 5G Health Risks

Frank Clegg, a leading technology executive and former President of Microsoft Canada, is sounding the alarm on the health risks associated with 5G technology, citing extensive research indicating grave dangers such as infertility, cancer, and DNA damage from RF radiation.

Currently the CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology, Clegg argues that the telecommunications industry’s regulatory measures are woefully inadequate.

In particular, Clegg underscores that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has outdated standards, rooted in 1996, which do not reflect current technological advancements or the rapid increase in wireless device usage. The FCC’s decision in 2019 to not update these exposure limits blatantly disregards the long-term impacts of wireless radiation.

Medical and Scientific Community’s Stand

A peer-reviewed body of work points to a range of adverse effects linked to wireless radiofrequency radiation, encompassing increased brain cancer, DNA damage, oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, and more.

Frank Clegg emphasizes, “5G will increase ambient levels of wireless radiofrequency radiation. Peer-reviewed research has demonstrated a myriad of adverse effects from wireless radiofrequency radiation including increased brain cancer, DNA damage, oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, altered brain development, damaged reproduction, sleep changes, hyperactivity, and memory damage.”

Moreover, thousands of doctors and scientists are advocating for a moratorium on 5G deployment due to its potential public health risks. According to Clegg, this endorsement showcases the severity of the issue and predicates a harsher scrutiny on existing regulations.

Regulatory Standards and Legal Oversight

The judicial system has already underscored this regulatory gap. A landmark ruling on August 13, 2021, in Environmental Health Trust et al. v. FCC found that the FCC had violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to update its guidelines based on recent scientific evidence.

Dr. Devra Davis commented on this, highlighting how the FCC had ignored substantial scientific evidence submitted since 2013.

This ruling has a global ripple effect as numerous countries model their standards on those of the FCC. Thus, updating these guidelines to reflect modern technological usage and advances is critical.

Why is Clegg Alarmed Now?

With an anticipated surge in wireless devices, Frank Clegg is voicing urgent calls for safer technological solutions that unearth the benefits of 5G without compromising human health. He highlights the onus is on the technology industry to prove the safety of their products.

Clegg advocates for increased public education regarding 5G health risks and emphasizes the need for stringent examination of wireless technology installations. This effort is crucial to ensuring public health, particularly for vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.

Actions for 5G Device Users

For those already using 5G devices, Clegg suggests simple yet effective measures. Using speaker mode or wired headphones during calls, avoiding prolonged close contact, and reducing usage time can mitigate some risks. Additionally, safety cards from the Environmental Health Trust are available for download and distribution to raise awareness among loved ones.

Future Steps and Regulations

Looking ahead, Clegg proposes a comprehensive reevaluation of existing regulations. He calls on policymakers to enforce stricter regulations that include updated exposure limits, taking into account current scientific evidence and the unique impacts on vulnerable populations. This initiative is integral to achieving the technological benefits of 5G while safeguarding public welfare.

Indeed, the judiciary’s decision and ongoing scientific research lay a strong foundation for a regulatory overhaul. Frank Clegg’s unyielding stance sheds light on an issue that mandates urgent action, ensuring our technological advancements don’t come at the expense of our health.