Beach Trail Blocked: Trespassers Face Gun Threat

Beach with mountains and clear blue water.

A crude cardboard sign featuring a gun drawing and a promise to shoot trespassers on sight now guards an eight-foot chain-link fence blocking the only public trail to a beloved California beach, igniting a legal battle that echoes one of the state’s most notorious coastal access wars.

Story Snapshot

Olympic Way LLC erected an 8-foot fence in January 2026 blocking the sole public trail from Olympic Way to Thornton State Beach in Daly City, complete with a handmade “trespassers will be shot on sight” warning.
San Mateo County Supervisor David Canepa demanded the California Coastal Commission force the fence’s removal, citing violations of the California Coastal Act guaranteeing public shoreline access.
The property owner’s 2021 plans for a private religious retreat were rejected by the Coastal Commission, fueling speculation the fence is retaliation.
The standoff mirrors the decade-long Martins Beach case where billionaire Vinod Khosla fought unsuccessfully to restrict public access after purchasing coastal property.

When Property Rights Collide With Public Beaches

Olympic Way LLC owns blufftop property adjacent to Thornton State Beach, a popular recreation spot where hikers, dog walkers, horseback riders, and families have used a single multi-use trail connecting Olympic Way parking areas to the sand below. The California Constitution and Coastal Act protect public access to all beaches below the high tide line, regardless of adjacent private ownership. This legal framework has withstood countless challenges from property owners who prize exclusivity over the public’s constitutional rights to enjoy California’s 1,100-mile coastline.

A Rejected Retreat and Suspicious Timing

The fence materialized in early January 2026, roughly five years after the California Coastal Commission shot down Olympic Way LLC’s proposal to build a private religious retreat on the bluffs. Residents immediately connected the dots, suspecting the barrier represents payback for bureaucratic rejection. The timing and aggressive messaging suggest either vindictiveness or an attempt to establish de facto control over land the owner cannot legally develop. Either way, the move contradicts decades of settled law affirming that private bluff ownership does not grant veto power over trails providing beach access.

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/2015587558114099330

The Khosla Precedent Looms Large

This dispute resurrects memories of Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla’s failed crusade to privatize Martins Beach in Half Moon Bay. After purchasing beachfront property for $32.5 million, Khosla locked a gate blocking the only road to the beach, triggering a legal war that stretched over a decade. The Surfrider Foundation sued, California courts sided with public access advocates, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Khosla’s appeal in 2018. The California Coastal Commission then filed its own enforcement action. Khosla’s defeat established ironclad precedent that wealthy landowners cannot weaponize property rights to exclude Californians from their own beaches.

Squatter Theory Versus LLC Accountability

Some online observers speculated that a squatter rather than Olympic Way LLC installed the fence and threatening sign, pointing to the unprofessional cardboard placard as evidence of unauthorized activity. This theory remains unverified speculation. Regardless of who physically erected the barrier, property owners bear legal responsibility for what happens on their land. If Olympic Way LLC tolerated or failed to remove an unauthorized fence blocking public access, that negligence constitutes its own violation. The sign’s crude nature does not absolve the landowner of culpability under California law.

Officials and Citizens Push Back Hard

San Mateo County Supervisor David Canepa wasted no time confronting the blockade, dispatching a letter to the California Coastal Commission chair demanding the fence’s immediate dismantling. Canepa framed the barrier as an assault on decades of collaborative work by the Commission and State Parks to preserve coastal access. Local residents launched a Change.org petition urging the state to purchase the property outright and fold it into Thornton State Beach, eliminating future disputes. Community activists flooded social media and prepared to testify at Daly City Council meetings, demonstrating that Bay Area residents will not surrender hard-won beach access without fierce resistance.

What Happens Next and Why It Matters

The California Coastal Commission holds ultimate enforcement authority and has successfully compelled fence removals in similar cases. The Khosla precedent suggests Olympic Way LLC faces an uphill legal battle if it contests removal orders. Short-term, hikers and equestrians lose their only trail to the beach, disrupting recreation and threatening local businesses like Mar Vista Stables. Long-term, failure to enforce removal could embolden copycat restrictions along California’s coast, chipping away at public rights through attrition. The state’s response will signal whether California’s constitutional commitment to coastal access retains teeth in the face of brazen defiance.

Property rights deserve respect, but they do not include the power to nullify constitutional guarantees enjoyed by millions of Californians. Olympic Way LLC’s fence represents either petty revenge for a lawful regulatory decision or reckless tolerance of unauthorized activity on its land. Either scenario demands swift enforcement. The California Coastal Act exists precisely to prevent landowners from treating public beaches as private fiefdoms. Supervisor Canepa and the Coastal Commission must act decisively to tear down this fence, just as they ultimately prevailed against Khosla’s obstinacy. Californians fought too hard for coastal access to let a cardboard threat and chain-link barrier reverse decades of legal victories.