Retail giant Walmart will pay $10 million after allegedly turning a blind eye to scammers who exploited its money transfer services, pocketing millions in fees while consumers lost their hard-earned money.
Key Takeaways
- Walmart agreed to pay $10 million to settle FTC allegations of allowing scammers to exploit its in-store money transfer services between 2013 and 2018.
- The FTC identified over $197 million in fraud-related payments through Walmart, with potential connections to over $1.3 billion in malicious activities.
- Despite allegedly being aware of the fraud, Walmart continued processing suspicious transactions through MoneyGram, Western Union, and Ria.
- The settlement prohibits Walmart from offering money transfer services without implementing proper fraud prevention measures.
- Walmart did not admit wrongdoing but stated it shares the FTC’s goal of protecting consumers from fraudsters.
FTC Crackdown on Money Transfer Fraud
The Federal Trade Commission has secured a $10 million settlement with Walmart following allegations that the retail giant enabled scammers to exploit its money transfer services. The lawsuit, filed in June 2022 in the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, claimed Walmart knowingly allowed fraudsters to use its in-store services like MoneyGram, Western Union, and Ria to defraud unsuspecting consumers. The FTC’s complaint covered activities from 2013 to 2018, during which Walmart allegedly processed suspicious transactions despite red flags indicating fraudulent activity.
The scale of the alleged fraud is substantial, with the FTC highlighting over $197 million in direct fraud-related payments processed through Walmart stores. Even more concerning, these transactions potentially connect to more than $1.3 billion in malicious activities. The lawsuit contends that Walmart not only failed to implement adequate safeguards but actively profited from these transactions through processing fees while vulnerable consumers lost their money to domestic and international fraud rings,” according to the FTC’s complaint.
Walmart’s Alleged Negligence and Response
Walmart’s approach to fraud prevention was woefully inadequate. The commission alleged that Walmart allowed suspicious money transfers to proceed, permitted large cash payouts with minimal verification, and failed to properly train employees to recognize and prevent fraudulent transactions. These practices created an environment where scammers could easily exploit the system, using Walmart stores as convenient locations to cash out their ill-gotten gains.
“Walmart looked the other way and pocketed millions in fees,” said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.
In response to the settlement, Walmart has not admitted any wrongdoing but expressed alignment with the FTC’s consumer protection goals. The company will now be required to implement comprehensive fraud prevention measures if it wishes to continue offering money transfer services. This includes enhanced training for employees, stronger verification procedures for large transactions, and improved systems for detecting suspicious patterns that may indicate fraudulent activity.
Walmart was ordered to pay $10 million after a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit that reflected the former failed to take adequate anti-fraud measures, leading to financial fraud
Read more:https://t.co/vU27Uwaym8#FTC #Walmart #10M #Retail #WireFraud #MoneyGram #CybercrimeNews pic.twitter.com/DJAFjng8Si
— TechNadu (@TechNadu) June 21, 2025
Impact on Consumers and Future Prevention
Money transfer scams represent one of the most damaging forms of consumer fraud, as victims typically have little recourse once funds are sent. The FTC’s action against Walmart highlights the critical role that financial service providers play in protecting consumers from predatory schemes. The settlement sends a clear message that corporations cannot profit from transactions they have reason to believe are fraudulent, regardless of whether they are directly participating in the scams.
“Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it’s sent, it’s gone for good,” stated Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.
A Walmart spokesperson responded to the settlement by stating: “We’re pleased to have this matter behind us. While it is clear in the agreement that we do not admit fault, we share in the FTC’s goal to protect consumers from fraudsters and continue to be dedicated to safeguarding consumers from fraud-induced money transfers.” The $10 million penalty, while significant, represents only a fraction of the estimated consumer losses from the fraud schemes that allegedly exploited Walmart’s services.
For consumers, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance when using money transfer services. Once money is sent via these methods, it is extremely difficult to recover, making prevention the most effective protection. The FTC continues to advise consumers to be wary of requests to send money to strangers, especially when pressured to act quickly or keep the transaction secret – common tactics employed by scammers targeting vulnerable individuals.
