Court Halts Trump’s Move to Dismiss Transgender Military Personnel in NJ

U.S. Air Force plane with trees in background.
U.S Air Force

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s transgender military ban, calling it a cruel irony that targets service members who risk their lives for the very constitutional rights now being denied to them.

Key Takeaways

  • Federal Judge Ana C. Reyes issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration’s attempt to remove transgender troops from military service.
  • Two Air Force members with exemplary service records were spared from discharge after court intervention.
  • The Pentagon had begun implementing Trump’s executive order by labeling gender dysphoria as “incompatible” with military service.
  • The court highlighted that no evidence supports claims that transgender service members harm military readiness.
  • An estimated 4,240 to 14,700 transgender individuals currently serve in the U.S. military.

Judge Blocks Trump’s Military Ban as Unconstitutional

In a significant blow to the Trump administration’s policy on transgender military service, U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Department of Defense from implementing a policy to discharge transgender service members. The Washington D.C. federal judge ruled that the policy, which stemmed from President Trump’s January 27 executive order, violated constitutional protections. This decision represents yet another federal court action halting or blocking President Trump’s executive orders, contributing to his mounting frustrations with the judiciary as barriers to his agenda.

The legal challenge was brought by six transgender service members and two prospective service members who argue the ban unjustly targets them based on their identity rather than their ability to serve. The executive order had claimed transgender identity was harmful to military readiness, though multiple studies contradict this assertion. Judge Reyes was particularly critical of this justification, drawing parallels to historical discrimination against other minority groups in the military that used similar arguments to exclude them from service.

New Jersey Airmen Win Temporary Protection

The broader ruling follows a similar decision in New Jersey, where U.S. District Judge Christine O’Hearn temporarily blocked the Trump administration from separating two transgender airmen from the military. Master Sgt. Logan Ireland and Staff Sgt. Nicholas Bear Bade had filed suit against the implementation of the orders by acting Air Force Secretary Gary Ashworth and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Both service members have exemplary records, having served in various international deployments, yet were placed on administrative absence – a status their lawsuit claims is stigmatizing and harmful to their careers.

“Indeed, the cruel irony is that thousands of transgender servicemembers have sacrificed — some risking their lives – to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the Military Ban seeks to deny them.” – Reyes

Judge O’Hearn determined that Ireland and Bade would face “severe harm” without a preliminary injunction, especially notable given that neither the Air Force nor the Department of Defense could demonstrate a compelling justification for immediately implementing the orders. This ruling represents a significant pushback against what many conservatives view as a necessary action to maintain traditional military structure, while liberals see the ban as discriminatory policy targeting a vulnerable group.

Administration Claims vs. Military Studies

The Pentagon had instructed military leaders to identify transgender service members and begin separation actions based on Trump’s executive order, which recognizes only two sexes and bars transgender individuals from serving openly. However, the administration’s position contradicts the findings of a 2016 RAND Corporation study that found no negative impact from allowing transgender individuals to serve. The Defense Department estimates 4,240 active duty service members have gender dysphoria, while the Palm Center, which studies LGBTQ military issues, estimates about 14,700 transgender troops currently serve.

“The President has the power—indeed the obligation—to ensure military readiness. At times, however, leaders have used concern for military readiness to deny marginalized persons the privilege of serving.” – Reyes

The legal confrontation over military service is just one front in the administration’s broader stance on transgender issues. The Department of Veterans Affairs had already announced reduced access to medical treatment for veterans with gender dysphoria, signaling a comprehensive approach to restricting accommodations for transgender individuals in military-related institutions. Such policies represent a sharp reversal from previous administrations and underscore the heated cultural and political battles that continue to divide Americans on issues of identity and national service.

Sources:

  1. Pentagon Blocked From Dismissing 2 Trans Airmen
  2. Federal court blocks Trump administration from separating 2 transgender airmen